Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Racemobambos celebica | S.Dransf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos ceramica | S.Dransf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos congesta | (Pilg.) Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos gibbsiae | (Stapf) Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos glabra | Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos hepburnii | S.Dransf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos hirsuta | Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos hirta | Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos holttumii | S.Dransf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos kutaiensis | S.Dransf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos multiramosa | Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos novohibernica | S.Dransf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos pairinii | K.M.Wong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos raynalii | Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos rigidifolia | Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos rupicola | Widjaja | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos schultzei | (Pilg.) Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos sessilis | Widjaja | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Racemobambos setifera | Holttum | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.