Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pylaisia polyantha | (Hedw.) Schimp. | 56 | documented |
| Pylaisia selwynii | Kindb. | 5 | documented |
| Pylaisia afoninae | B.H.Allen & W.R.Buck | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia bezgodovii | Ignatov & Ignatova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia brevirostris | (Griff.) A.Jaeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia brotheri | Besch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia buckii | T.Y.Chiang & C.Y.Lin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia condensata | (Mitt.) A.Jaeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia coreana | Nog. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia cristata | Cardot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia curviramea | Dixon | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia euendostoma | (Herzog) Frank Müll., Jan Kučera & S.He | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia extenta | (Mitt.) A.Jaeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia falcata | Schimp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia intricata | (Hedw.) Schimp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia levieri | (Müll.Hal.) Arikawa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia nana | Mitt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia obtusa | Lindb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia pseudofertilis | Podp. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia speciosa | (Mitt.) A.Jaeger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia steerei | (Ando & Higuchi) Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pylaisia subcircinata | Cardot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.