Pternopetalum

Accepted species 21 Documented here 0 Family Apiaceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Pternopetalum arunachalense Bhaumik & P.Satyanar. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum bipinnatum Li Song Wang 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum botrychioides (Dunn) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum caespitosum R.H.Shan 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum cuneifolium (H.Wolff) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum davidii Franch. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum delavayi (Franch.) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum gracillimum (H.Wolff) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum latipinnulatum (R.H.Shan) J.B.Tan & X.J.He 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum leptophyllum (Dunn) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum molle (Franch.) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum monophyllum J.B.Tan & X.J.He 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum nudicaule (H.Boissieu) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum paucifoliolatum J.F.Ye, X.Jie Li & Ce H.Li 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum porphyronotum J.B.Tan 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum rosthornii (Diels) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum senii Deb & R.M.Dutta 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum subalpinum Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum tanakae (Franch. & Sav.) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum trichomanifolium (Franch.) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate
Pternopetalum vulgare (Dunn) Hand.-Mazz. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.