Psychrogeton

Accepted species 21 Documented here 1 Family Asteraceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Psychrogeton cabulicus Boiss. 3 documented
Psychrogeton aellenii (Rech.f.) Grierson 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton alexeenkoi Krasch. 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton amorphoglossus (Boiss.) Novopokr. 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton andryaloides (DC.) Novopokr. ex Krasch. 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton candidissimus (Rech.f. & Edelb.) Grierson 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton capusii (Franch.) Novopokr. ex Krasch. 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton chionophilus (Boiss.) Krasch. 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton drabiformis Grierson 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton khorossanicus (Boiss.) Fisjun 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton lumbricoides (Gilli) Grierson 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton nabidshonii (Kamelin) Kochk. & Zhogoleva 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton nigromontanus (Boiss. & Buhse) Grierson 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton olgae (Regel & Schmalh.) Novopokr. ex Nevski 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton persicus (Boiss.) Grierson 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton poncinsii (Franch.) Y.Ling & Y.L.Chen 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton pseudoerigeron (Bunge) Novopokr. ex Nevski 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton rotundifolius Grierson 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton shahrestanicus Rech.f. 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton sphaeroxylus (Gilli) Grierson 0 below the evidence gate
Psychrogeton turkestanicus O.Hoffm. ex Paulsen 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.