Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudoxandra acreana | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra angustifolia | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra atrata | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra bahiensis | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra borbensis | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra cauliflora | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra cuspidata | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra duckei | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra laevigata | (Mart.) Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra leiophylla | (Diels) R.E.Fr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra longipes | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra obscurinervis | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra pacifica | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra papillosa | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra parvifolia | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra pilosa | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra polyphleba | (Diels) R.E.Fr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra revoluta | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra rionegrensis | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra sclerocarpa | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra spiritus-sancti | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra vallicola | Maas | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra williamsii | (R.E.Fr.) R.E.Fr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudoxandra xylopiifolia | Maas & Westra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.