Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudolycopodiella caroliniana | (L.) Holub | 176 | documented |
| Pseudolycopodiella sarcocaulon | (A.Braun & Welw.) Holub | 3 | documented |
| Pseudolycopodiella meridionalis | (Underw. & F.E.Lloyd) Holub | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella affinis | (Bory) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella brevipedunculata | (Herter) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella carnosa | (Silveira) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella contexta | (Mart.) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella floridana | K.Cook & Hickey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella iuliformis | (Underw. & F.E.Lloyd) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella krameriana | (B.Øllg.) B.Øllg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella limosa | (Chinnock) A.R.Field | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella paradoxa | (Mart.) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella squamata | B.Øllg. & P.G.Windisch | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella subinundata | (Tagawa) Li Bing Zhang, Xia Wan, Ralf Knapp & H.He | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella tatei | (A.C.Sm.) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudolycopodiella tuberosa | (A.Braun & Welw.) Holub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.