Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudohygrohypnum fauriei | (Cardot) Jan Kučera & Ignatov | 6 | documented |
| Pseudohygrohypnum appalachianum | Brinda, Fedosov & Ignatova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum calcicola | (Ando) Jan Kučera & Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum densirameum | (Ando) Jan Kučera & Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum emodifertile | (Broth. ex Ando) Jan Kučera & Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum eugyrium | (Schimp.) Kanda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum fertile | (Sendtn.) Jan Kučera & Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum neglectum | Fedosov & Ignatova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum orientale | Fedosov & Ignatova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum perspicuum | (Mitt.) Jan Kučera & Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum purpurascens | (Broth.) Kanda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum sibiricum | Fedosov & Ignatova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum skottsbergii | (Ando) Jan Kučera & Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum subarcticum | Fedosov & Ignatova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum subeugyrium | (Renauld & Cardot) Ignatov & Ignatova | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudohygrohypnum submolluscum | (Besch.) Jan Kučera & Ignatov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.