Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pseuderia amblyornidis | (Rchb.f.) Ormerod | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia brevifolia | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia diversifolia | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia floribunda | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia foliosa | (Brongn.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia frutex | (Schltr.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia ledermannii | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia micronesiaca | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia nigricans | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia pauciflora | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia platyphylla | L.O.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia ramosa | L.O.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia robusta | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia samarana | Z.D.Meneses & Cootes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia sepikana | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia similis | (Schltr.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia smithiana | C.Schweinf. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia sympodialis | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia takeuchii | Ormerod | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia trachychila | (Kraenzl.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseuderia wariana | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.