Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudabutilon umbellatum | (L.) Fryxell | 5 | documented |
| Pseudabutilon virgatum | (Cav.) Fryxell | 5 | documented |
| Pseudabutilon scabrum | (C.Presl) R.E.Fr. | 3 | documented |
| Pseudabutilon cinereum | (Griseb.) Krapov. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon aristulosum | (K.Schum.) Krapov. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon benense | (Britton) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon callimorphum | (Hochr.) R.E.Fr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon cowanii | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon cymosum | (Triana & Planch.) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon depauperatum | (Hook.f.) Kearney | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon ellipticum | (Schltdl.) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon glomeratum | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon harleyi | Krapov. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon leucothrix | Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon nigropunctulatum | (Ulbr.) R.E.Fr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon orientale | (Standl. & Steyerm.) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon pedunculatum | (R.E.Fr.) Krapov. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon pintoi | Monteiro | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pseudabutilon thurberi | (A.Gray) Fryxell | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.