Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protolophozia androgyna | R.M.Schust. ex Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia autoica | (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia crispata | (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia druceae | (Grolle & E.A.Hodgs.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia elongata | (Steph.) Schljakov | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia herzogiana | (E.A.Hodgs. & Grolle) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia lancistipa | (Grolle) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia leucorhiza | (Mitt.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia longiflora | (Herzog) L.Söderstr. & Váňa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia monoica | (E.A.Hodgs.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia multicuspidata | (Hook.f. & Taylor) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia nivicola | (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia perssoniana | (H.A.Mill.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia subalpina | (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia tasmanica | (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Protolophozia verruculosa | (R.M.Schust.) Váňa & L.Söderstr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.