Procris

Accepted species 24 Documented here 1 Family Urticaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Procris pedunculata (J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.) Wedd. 87 documented
Procris repens (Lour.) B.J.Conn & Hadiah 1 below the evidence gate
Procris acaulis (Hook.f.) B.J.Conn & Hadiah 0 below the evidence gate
Procris anfracta (A.C.Sm.) A.C.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris archboldiana A.C.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris boninensis Tuyama 0 below the evidence gate
Procris brunnea Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris crenata C.B.Rob. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris curtisii (Ridl.) B.J.Conn & Hadiah 0 below the evidence gate
Procris decurrens (H.J.P.Winkl.) R.J.Johns 0 below the evidence gate
Procris dolichophylla Merr. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris frutescens Blume 0 below the evidence gate
Procris goepeliana (A.C.Sm.) A.C.Sm. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris grueningii (H.J.P.Winkl.) H.Schroet. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris insularis H.Schroet. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris langbianensis Gagnep. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris mindanaensis H.Schroet. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris pilifera (H.J.P.Winkl.) H.Schroet. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris puberula (Hallier f.) H.Schroet. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris rectangulare (H.J.P.Winkl.) R.J.Johns 0 below the evidence gate
Procris reticulato-venosa (Hallier f.) H.Schroet. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris ruhlandii H.Schroet. 0 below the evidence gate
Procris urdanetensis Elmer 0 below the evidence gate
Procris visciformis (Hallier f.) H.Schroet. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.