Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priva lappulacea | (L.) Pers. | 183 | documented |
| Priva adhaerens | (Forssk.) Chiov. | 60 | documented |
| Priva aspera | Kunth | 21 | documented |
| Priva grandiflora | (Ortega) Moldenke | 8 | documented |
| Priva mexicana | (L.) Pers. | 8 | documented |
| Priva cordifolia | (L.f.) Druce | 4 | documented |
| Priva flabelliformis | (Moldenke) R.Fern. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva africana | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva armata | S.Watson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva auricoccea | A.Meeuse | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva bahiensis | Schauer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva boliviana | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva curtisiae | Kobuski | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva domingensis | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva favargeri | R.Fern. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva humbertii | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva ibugana | Rzed. & Calderón | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva laciniata | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva meyeri | Jaub. & Spach | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva pedicellata | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva peruviana | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva portoricensis | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Priva socotrana | Moldenke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.