Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Praxelis clematidea | R.M.King & H.Rob. | 457 | documented |
| Praxelis asperulacea | (Baker) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis basifolia | (Malme) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis capillaris | (DC.) Sch.Bip. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis chiquitensis | (B.L.Rob.) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis conoclinanthia | (Hieron.) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis decumbens | (Gardner) Teles & R.Esteves | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis diffusa | (Rich.) Pruski | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis grandiflora | (DC.) Sch.Bip. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis insignia | (Malme) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis karuaiensis | (V.M.Badillo) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis kleinioides | (Kunth) Sch.Bip. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis missiona | (Malme) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis odontodactyla | (B.L.Rob.) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis ostenii | (B.L.Rob.) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis pauciflora | (Kunth) R.M.King & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Praxelis splettii | H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.