Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Potameia antevaratra | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia argentea | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia capuronii | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia chartacea | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia confluens | van der Werff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia crassifolia | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia eglandulosa | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia elliptica | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia incisa | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia micrantha | van der Werff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia microphylla | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia nitens | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia obtusifolia | van der Werff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia resonjo | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia reticulata | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia rubra | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia salicifolia | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia siamensis | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia thouarsiana | (Baill.) Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia thouarsii | Roem. & Schult. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia tomentella | van der Werff | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia vacciniifolia | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Potameia velutina | Kosterm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.