Posoqueria

Accepted species 22 Documented here 1 Family Rubiaceae

Accepted species 22 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Posoqueria latifolia (Rudge) Schult. 16 documented
Posoqueria acutifolia Mart. 2 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria bahiensis Macias & L.S.Kinosh. 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria calantha Barb.Rodr. 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria chocoana C.M.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria coriacea M.Martens & Galeotti 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria correana C.M.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria costaricensis C.M.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria fragrantissima Linden & André 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria grandiflora Standl. 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria grandifructa Hammel & C.M.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria laevis C.M.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria laurifolia Mart. 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria longifilamentosa C.M.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria longiflora Aubl. 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria palustris Mart. 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria platysiphonia Rusby 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria robusta Hammel & C.M.Taylor 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria tarairensis C.M.Taylor & Cortés-Ballén 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria trinitatis DC. 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria velutina Standl. 0 below the evidence gate
Posoqueria williamsii Steyerm. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.