Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porterandia anisophylla | (Jack ex Roxb.) Ridl. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia beamanii | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia bruneiensis | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia catappifolia | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia celebica | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia chanii | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia congestiflora | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia dinghoui | Zahid & K.M.Wong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia glabrifolia | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia grandifolia | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia hosei | (Merr.) Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia kalimantanensis | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia lambirensis | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia laxiflora | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia macroptera | (Miq.) Tirveng. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia minor | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia pauciflora | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia postarii | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia puffii | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia rarissima | Zahid | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia scortechinii | (King & Gamble) Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Porterandia subsessilis | (Valeton) Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.