Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polypleurum chinense | B.Hua Chen & Miao Zhang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum dichotomum | (Gardner) J.B.Hall | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum disciforme | C.J.Mathew & Nileena | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum elongatum | (Gardner) J.B.Hall | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum erectum | M.Kato | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum filifolium | (Ramam. & J.Joseph) A.S.Rao & Hajra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum insulare | M.Kato & Koi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum longicaule | M.Kato | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum longifolium | M.Kato | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum longistylosum | M.Kato | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum munnarense | Nagendran & Arekal | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum phuwuaense | M.Kato | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum pluricostatum | Koi & M.Kato | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum prachinburiense | M.Kato & Koi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum prostratum | C.J.Mathew & Nileena | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum schmidtianum | Warm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum sisaketense | M.Kato & Koi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum wallichii | (R.Br. ex Griff.) Warm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polypleurum wongprasertii | M.Kato | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.