Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyphlebium venosum | (R.Br.) Copel. | 187 | documented |
| Polyphlebium endlicherianum | (C.Presl) Ebihara & K.Iwats. | 36 | documented |
| Polyphlebium colensoi | (Hook.f.) Ebihara & K.Iwats. | 7 | documented |
| Polyphlebium capillaceum | (L.) Ebihara & Dubuisson | 4 | documented |
| Polyphlebium vieillardii | (Bosch) Ebihara & K.Iwats. | 3 | documented |
| Polyphlebium angustatum | (Carmich.) Ebihara & Dubuisson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium diaphanum | (Kunth) Ebihara & Dubuisson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium exsectum | (Kunze) Ebihara & Dubuisson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium haughtii | (C. V. Morton) comb. ined. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium herzogii | (Rosenst.) A.R.Sm. & M.Kessler | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium hymenophylloides | (Bosch) Ebihara & Dubuisson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium ingae | (C.Chr.) Ebihara & Dubuisson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium philippianum | (Sturm) Ebihara & Dubuisson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium serratifolium | (Rosenst.) Gonzatti & P.G.Windisch | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium tenuissimum | (Bosch) comb. ined. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polyphlebium werneri | (Rosenst.) Ebihara & K.Iwats. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.