Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polycarpaea corymbosa | (L.) Lam. | 64 | documented |
| Polycarpaea nivea | Webb | 14 | documented |
| Polycarpaea gayi | Webb | 9 | documented |
| Polycarpaea robbairea | (Kuntze) Greuter & Burdet | 7 | documented |
| Polycarpaea aristata | (Aiton) C.Sm. ex DC. | 5 | documented |
| Polycarpaea aurea | (Wight) Wight & Arn. ex B.D.Jacks. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea carnosa | C.Sm. ex Link | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea douliotii | Danguy | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea eriantha | Hochst. ex A.Rich. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea gaudichaudii | Gagnep. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea glabrifolia | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea grahamii | Turrill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea hassleriana | Chodat & Hassl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea inaequalifolia | Engl. & Gilg | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea linearifolia | (DC.) DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea poggei | Pax | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea repens | Asch. & Schweinf. ex Asch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea rosulans | (Gagnep.) Gagnep. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea spicata | Wight ex Arn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea stellata | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea tenuifolia | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Polycarpaea tenuistyla | Turrill | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.