Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pollia japonica | Thunb. | 110 | documented |
| Pollia miranda | (H.Lév.) H.Hara | 67 | documented |
| Pollia crispata | (R.Br.) Benth. | 63 | documented |
| Pollia macrophylla | (R.Br.) Benth. | 15 | documented |
| Pollia condensata | C.B.Clarke | 7 | documented |
| Pollia secundiflora | (Blume) Bakh.f. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia × zollingeri | (Hassk.) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia americana | Faden | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia bracteata | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia gracilis | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia hasskarlii | R.S.Rao | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia horsfieldii | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia macrobracteata | D.Y.Hong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia mannii | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia papuana | Ridl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia pentasperma | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia sambiranensis | H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia subumbellata | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia sumatrana | Hassk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia thyrsiflora | (Blume) Steud. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia thyrsiflora | (Blume) Endl. ex Hassk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia verticillata | Hallier f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pollia zollingeri | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.