Pleocnemia

Accepted species 21 Documented here 2 Family Dryopteridaceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Pleocnemia submembranacea (Hayata) Tagawa & K.Iwats. 17 documented
Pleocnemia irregularis (C.Presl) Holttum 14 documented
Pleocnemia acuminata Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia andaiensis (Baker) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia brongniartii (Bory) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia conjugata C.Presl 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia cumingiana C.Presl 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia dahlii (Hieron.) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia elegans (Copel.) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia hemiteliiformis (Racib.) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia intermedia Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia leuzeana (Gaudich.) C.Presl 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia macrodonta (Fée) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia megaphylla Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia milnei E.Fourn. 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia nesiotica (Holttum) H.G.Zhao & S.Y.Dong 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia olivacea (Copel.) Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia pleiotricha Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia presliana Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia seranensis Holttum 0 below the evidence gate
Pleocnemia siamensis X.G.Xu & Li Bing Zhang 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.