Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platymiscium pinnatum | (Jacq.) Dugand | 16 | documented |
| Platymiscium trifoliolatum | Benth. | 11 | documented |
| Platymiscium floribundum | Vogel | 4 | documented |
| Platymiscium albertinae | Standl. & L.O.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium calyptratum | M.Sousa & Klitg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium curuense | N.Zamora & Klitg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium darienense | Dwyer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium dimorphandrum | Donn.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium filipes | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium gracile | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium hebestachyum | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium jejunum | Klitg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium lasiocarpum | Sandwith | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium parviflorum | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium pubescens | Micheli | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium speciosum | Vogel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium stipulare | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium trinitatis | Benth. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platymiscium yucatanum | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.