Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platylepis glandulosa | (Lindl.) Rchb.f. | 5 | documented |
| Platylepis bombus | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis commelynae | (Lindl.) Rchb.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis constricta | (J.J.Sm.) J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis densiflora | Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis flaccida | (Schltr.) M.C.Pace | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis geluana | (Schltr.) Schuit. & de Vogel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis goudotii | (Ormerod & Cavestro) M.C.Pace | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis grandiflora | (Schltr.) Ormerod | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis heteromorpha | Rchb.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis hosokawae | (Fukuy.) J.M.H.Shaw | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis intricata | Schuit. & de Vogel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis laxa | (Schltr.) J.M.H.Shaw | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis leucantha | (Schltr.) J.M.H.Shaw | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis margaritifera | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis occulta | (Thouars) Rchb.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis scripta | (Rchb.f.) M.C.Pace | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis tidorensis | J.J.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis xerostele | Ormerod | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platylepis zeuxinoides | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.