Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platycoryne affinis | Summerh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne alinae | Szlach. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne ambigua | (Kraenzl.) Summerh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne brevirostris | Summerh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne buchananiana | (Kraenzl.) Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne crocea | Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne guingangae | (Rchb.f.) Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne isoetifolia | P.J.Cribb | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne latipetala | Summerh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne lisowskiana | Szlach. & Kras | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne macroceras | Summerh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne mediocris | Summerh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne megalorrhyncha | Summerh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne micrantha | Summerh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne ochyrana | Szlach., Mytnik, Rutk., Jerch. & Baranow | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne paludosa | (Lindl.) Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne pervillei | Rchb.f. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne protearum | (Rchb.f.) Rolfe | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycoryne trilobata | Summerh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.