Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platycerium bifurcatum | (Cav.) C.Chr. | 212 | documented |
| Platycerium superbum | Joncheere & Hennipman | 81 | documented |
| Platycerium hillii | T.Moore | 20 | documented |
| Platycerium coronarium | (Konig) Desv. | 13 | documented |
| Platycerium elephantotis | Schweinf. | 8 | documented |
| Platycerium stemaria | (Beauv.) Desv. | 7 | documented |
| Platycerium alcicorne | (P.Willemet) Desv. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium grande | (A.Cunn.) J.Sm. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium ellisii | Baker | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium holttumii | Joncheere & Hennipman | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium quadridichotomum | (Bonap.) Tardieu | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium ridleyi | Christ | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium veitchii | (Underw.) C.Chr. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium wallichii | Hook. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium × elemaria | Hoshiz. & M.G.Price | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium × kitshakoodiense | Ploy-ratana, Wannakr. & J.M.H.Shaw | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium × mentelosii | Hoshiz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium andinum | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium madagascariense | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium wandae | Racib. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Platycerium willinckii | T.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.