Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pityrodia lepidota | (F.Muell.) E.Pritz. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia hemigenioides | (F.Muell.) Benth. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia pungens | Munir | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia augustensis | Munir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia brynesii | Munir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia canaliculata | A.S.George | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia chrysocalyx | (F.Muell.) C.A.Gardner | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia gilruthiana | Munir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia iphthima | K.A.Sheph. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia jamesii | Specht | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia lanuginosa | Munir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia loricata | (F.Muell.) E.Pritz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia obliqua | W.Fitzg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia puberula | Munir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia salvifolia | R.Br. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia scabra | A.S.George | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia serrata | Munir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia spenceri | Munir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia ternifolia | (F.Muell.) Munir | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pityrodia viscida | W.Fitzg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.