Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilocarpus pennatifolius | Lem. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus alatus | C.J.Joseph ex Skorupa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus carajaensis | Skorupa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus cubensis | (Borhidi & Muñiz) H.Lippold | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus demerarae | Sandwith | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus giganteus | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus goudotianus | Tul. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus grandiflorus | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus jaborandi | Holmes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus manuensis | Skorupa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus microphyllus | Stapf ex Wardlew. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus pauciflorus | A.St.-Hil. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus peruvianus | (J.F.Macbr.) Kaastra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus racemosus | Vahl | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus riedelianus | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus spicatus | A.St.-Hil. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus sulcatus | Skorupa | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus trachylophus | Holmes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pilocarpus trifoliolatus | Skorupa & Pirani | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.