Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pieris japonica | (Thunb.) D.Don ex G.Don | 81 | documented |
| Pieris floribunda | (Pursh) Benth. & Hook.f. | 43 | documented |
| Pieris phillyreifolia | (Hook.) DC. | 34 | documented |
| Pieris formosa | (Wall.) D.Don | 13 | documented |
| Pieris amamioshimensis | Setoguchi & Y.Maeda | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris coreana | H.Lév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris cubensis | (Griseb.) Small | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris fauriei | H.Lév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris formosana | Komatsu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris griffithiana | Hook.f. ex C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris huana | W.P.Fang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris huiana | W.P.Fang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris koidzumiana | Ohwi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris labordei | H.Lév. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris langbianensis | A.Chev. ex Dop | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris longicornu | H.Lév. & Vaniot | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris morrisonensis | Hayata | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris nana | (Maxim.) Makino | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris pilosa | Komatsu | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris popowii | Palib. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris shanica | W.W.Sm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris sinensis | Sweet | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pieris swinhoei | Hemsl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.