Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phyllopentas austroorientalis | (Homolle & Verdc.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas concinna | (K.Schum.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas decaryana | (Homolle ex Verdc.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas elata | (K.Schum.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas flava | Razafim., Andriamih. & Kårehed | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas hirtiflora | (Baker) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas ionolaena | (K.Schum.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas ledermannii | (K.Krause) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas madagascariensis | (Verdc.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas mussaendoides | (Baker) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas schimperi | (Hochst.) Y.D.Zhou & Q.F.Wang | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas schumanniana | (K.Krause) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas tenuis | (Verdc.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllopentas ulugurica | (Verdc.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.