Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phyllarthron bernierianum | Seem. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron antongiliense | Capuron | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron bojerianum | DC. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron arenicola | Rakotoaris. & Rabarij. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron articulatum | (Desf.) K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron bilabiatum | A.H.Gentry | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron cauliflorum | Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron comorense | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron humblotianum | H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron ilicifolium | (Pers.) H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron laxinervium | H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron longipedunculatum | Callm. & Phillipson | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron megaphyllum | Capuron | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron megapterum | H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron multiflorum | H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron nocturnum | Zjhra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron sahamalazensis | Zjhra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron suarezense | H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron subumbellatum | H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phyllarthron vokoaninensis | Zjhra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.