Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phialanthus acunae | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus alainii | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus bissei | (Borhidi) Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus ellipticus | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus glaberrimus | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus grandifolius | Alain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus guantanamensis | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus hispaniolae | Alain & R.G.García | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus inflatus | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus jamaicensis | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus linearis | Alain | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus macrocalyx | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus macrostemon | Standl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus marianus | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus myrtilloides | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus oblongatus | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus parvifolius | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus peduncularis | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus resinifluus | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus revolutus | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus rigidus | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phialanthus stillans | Griseb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.