Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phaulopsis imbricata | (Forssk.) Sweet | 52 | documented |
| Phaulopsis dorsiflora | (Retz.) Santapau | 14 | documented |
| Phaulopsis barteri | T.Anderson | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis aequivoca | Mankt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis angolana | S.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis ciliata | (Willd.) Hepper | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis gediensis | Mankt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis grandiflora | Mankt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis johnstonii | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis lankesterioides | (Lindau) Lindau | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis latiloba | Mankt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis lindaviana | De Wild. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis marcelinoi | Mankt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis micrantha | (Benth.) C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis pulchella | Mankt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis rupestris | (Nees) Lindau | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis sangana | S.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis savannicola | Mankt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis semiconica | P.G.Mey. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis symmetrica | Mankt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis talbotii | S.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis tanzaniensis | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phaulopsis verticillaris | (Nees) Mankt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.