Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phalaris arundinacea | L. | 2,280 | documented |
| Phalaris aquatica | L. | 365 | documented |
| Phalaris caroliniana | Walter | 133 | documented |
| Phalaris canariensis | L. | 81 | documented |
| Phalaris minor | Retz. | 45 | documented |
| Phalaris paradoxa | L. | 19 | documented |
| Phalaris coerulescens | Desf. | 7 | documented |
| Phalaris angusta | Nees ex Trin. | 6 | documented |
| Phalaris californica | Hook. & Arn. | 5 | documented |
| Phalaris lemmonii | Vasey | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris × daviesii | S.T.Blake | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris amethystina | Trin. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris brachystachys | Link | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris lindigii | Baldini | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris maderensis | (Menezes) Menezes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris peruviana | H.Scholz & Gutte | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris platensis | Henrard ex Wacht. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris primaeva | (C.Brues & B.Brues) Beetle | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris truncata | Guss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Phalaris truncata | Guss. ex Bertol. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.