Petrosedum

Accepted species 24 Documented here 9 Family Crassulaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Petrosedum sediforme (Jacq.) Grulich 514 documented
Petrosedum rupestre (L.) P.V.Heath 233 documented
Petrosedum forsterianum (Sm.) Grulich 139 documented
Petrosedum ochroleucum (Chaix) Niederle 39 documented
Petrosedum montanum (Songeon & E.P.Perrier) Grulich 37 documented
Petrosedum orientale (t'Hart) Grulich 32 documented
Petrosedum pruinatum (Brot.) Grulich 28 documented
Petrosedum amplexicaule (DC.) Velayos 20 documented
Petrosedum subulatum (C.A.Mey.) Afferni 5 documented
Petrosedum dianium (O.Bolòs) Afferni 2 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × affomarcoi (L.Gallo & Afferni) Afferni 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × bellardii L.Gallo 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × brevierei (Chass. ex L.Gallo) Afferni 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × elaverinum (L.Gallo & J.-M.Tison) L.Gallo 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × estrelae Gideon F.Sm. & R.Stephenson 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × henkii (L.Gallo) Afferni 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × hommelsii ('t Hart) Niederle 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × lorenzoi ('t Hart) Niederle 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × luteolum (Chab.) Grulich 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum × pascalianum (L.Gallo) Afferni 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum albescens Afferni 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum erectum (t'Hart) Grulich 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum monteferraticum Niederle 0 below the evidence gate
Petrosedum tenuifolium (Sm.) Grulich 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.