Perrottetia

Accepted species 21 Documented here 2 Family Dipentodontaceae

Accepted species 21 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Perrottetia arisanensis Hayata 49 documented
Perrottetia sandwicensis A.Gray 26 documented
Perrottetia alpestris (Blume) Loes. 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia calva Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia colorata R.Sánchez & Fern.Alonso 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia distichophylla Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia excelsa Lundell 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia gentryi Lundell 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia guacharana R.Sánchez & Fern.Alonso 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia lanceolata H.Karst. 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia longistylis Rose 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia maxima Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia multiflora Lundell 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia ovata Hemsl. 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia panamensis Lundell 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia quinduensis Kunth 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia racemosa (Oliv.) Loes. 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia sessiliflora Lundell 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia simplicissima R.Sánchez & Fern.Alonso 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia taronensis B.M.Barthol. & K.Armstr. 0 below the evidence gate
Perrottetia wichmaniorum Lorence & W.L.Wagner 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.