Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pentzia incana | (Thunb.) Kuntze | 162 | documented |
| Pentzia dentata | (L.) Kuntze | 76 | documented |
| Pentzia elegans | DC. | 35 | documented |
| Pentzia quinquefida | Less. | 20 | documented |
| Pentzia globosa | Less. | 19 | documented |
| Pentzia cooperi | Harv. | 9 | documented |
| Pentzia spinescens | Less. | 8 | documented |
| Pentzia hesperidum | Maire & Wilczek | 4 | documented |
| Pentzia peduncularis | B.Nord. | 3 | documented |
| Pentzia calcarea | Kies | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia argentea | Hutch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia bolusii | Hutch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia calva | S.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia lanata | Hutch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia monocephala | S.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia monodiana | Maire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia nana | Burch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia oppositifolia | Magee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia pinnatisecta | Hutch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia punctata | Harv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia somalensis | E.A.Bruce ex Thulin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia sphaerocephala | DC. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia tomentosa | B.Nord. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia tortuosa | Fenzl ex Harv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentzia viridis | Kies | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.