Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pentopetia albicans | (Jum. & H.Perrier) Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia androsaemifolia | Decne. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia astephana | Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia bidens | Jum. & H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia boivinii | Costantin & Gallaud | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia bosseri | Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia calycina | Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia cotoneaster | Decne. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia dasynema | Choux | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia dolichopodia | Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia ecoronata | Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia elastica | Jum. & H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia glaberrima | Choux | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia grevei | (Baill.) Venter | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia intermedia | Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia longipetala | Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia lutea | Klack. & Civeyrel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia mollis | Jum. & H.Perrier | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia ovalifolia | (Costantin & Gallaud) Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia pinnata | Costantin & Gallaud | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia urceolata | Klack. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentopetia viridis | Klack. & Meve | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.