Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pentanisia angustifolia | (Hochst.) Hochst. | 244 | documented |
| Pentanisia prunelloides | (Klotzsch ex Eckl. & Zeyh.) Walp. | 156 | documented |
| Pentanisia ouranogyne | S.Moore | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia annua | K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia arenaria | (Hiern) Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia calcicola | Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia confertifolia | (Baker) Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia foetida | Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia gossweileri | (Verdc.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia longepedunculata | Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia longituba | (Franch.) Oliv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia microphylla | (Franch.) Chiov. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia monticola | (K.Krause) Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia procumbens | R.D.Good | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia renifolia | Verdc. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia rubricaulis | (K.Schum.) Kårehed & B.Bremer | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia schweinfurthii | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia sykesii | Hutch. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pentanisia veronicoides | (Baker) K.Schum. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.