Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pellaeopsis pilosa | (Poir.) Windham | 4 | documented |
| Pellaeopsis dura | (Willd.) Windham | 4 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis boivinii | (Hook.) Windham | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis pectiniformis | (Baker) Windham | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis angulosa | (Bory ex Willd.) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis buchananii | (Baker) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis deboeri | (Verdc.) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis doniana | (Hook.) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis inaequalis | (Kunze) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis lanceolata | (Bonap.) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis leachii | (Schelpe) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis longipilosa | (Bonap.) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis madagascariensis | (Tardieu) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis pedatoides | (Desv.) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis schippersii | (Verdc.) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis schweinfurthii | (Hieron. ex Diels) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis similis | (F.Ballard) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pellaeopsis tomentosa | (Bonap.) Windham | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.