Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paracephaelis aristata | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis bardotiae | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis capitulifera | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis cinerea | (A.Rich. ex DC.) De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis comorensis | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis gautieri | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis grandifructa | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis longipedicellata | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis orientalis | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis pauciflora | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis ranirisonii | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis russata | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis sambavensis | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis saxatilis | (Scott Elliot) De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis sericea | (Arènes) De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis seyrigii | De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis tiliacea | Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paracephaelis trichantha | (Baker) De Block | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.