Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paphia neocaledonica | (Guillaumin) P.F.Stevens | 4 | documented |
| Paphia alberti-eduardii | (Sleumer) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia brassii | (Sleumer) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia carrii | (Sleumer) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia costata | (C.H.Wright) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia helenae | (F.Muell.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia kudukii | (Veldkamp) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia megaphylla | P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia meiniana | (F.Muell.) Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia paniensis | S.Venter & Munzinger | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia prostrata | (P.F.Stevens) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia rubrocalyx | (Sleumer) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia sclerophylla | (Sleumer) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia shungolensis | (P.F.Stevens) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia sleumeriana | (P.F.Stevens) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia stenantha | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia viridiflora | Schltr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia vitiensis | Seem. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia vitis-idaea | (Sleumer) P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia vulcanicola | P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Paphia woodsii | P.F.Stevens | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.