Panopsis

Accepted species 25 Documented here 2 Family Proteaceae

Accepted species 25 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Panopsis costaricensis Standl. 9 documented
Panopsis suaveolens (Klotzsch) Pittier 3 documented
Panopsis acostana J.F.Morales 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis antioquensis L.E.Gut. 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis cinnamomea Pittier 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis hernandezii L.E.Gut. 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis lozanoi L.E.Gut. 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis macrocarpa K.S.Edwards & R.T.Penn. 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis megistosperma Bonifaz & Cornejo 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis mucronata Cuatrec. 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis multiflora (Schott ex Endl.) Ducke 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis parimensis Steyerm. 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis pearcei Rusby 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis perijensis K.S.Edwards 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis polystachya (Kunth) Kuntze 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis ptariana Steyerm. 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis rectistyla K.S.Edwards 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis roldosii Bonifaz, Cornejo & C.Ulloa 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis rubescens Pittier 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis rubescens (Pohl) Pittier 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis sessilifolia (Rich.) Sandwith 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis sulcata K.S.Edwards 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis tepuiana Steyerm. 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis yolombo (Posada-Ar.) Killip 0 below the evidence gate
Panopsis yungasensis K.S.Edwards & R.T.Penn. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.