Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pancratium maritimum | L. | 448 | documented |
| Pancratium illyricum | L. | 36 | documented |
| Pancratium tenuifolium | Hochst. | 26 | documented |
| Pancratium triflorum | Roxb. | 15 | documented |
| Pancratium canariense | [Ker-Gawl.] | 8 | documented |
| Pancratium sickenbergeri | Asch. & Schweinf. ex Boiss. | 6 | documented |
| Pancratium trianthum | Herb. | 3 | documented |
| Pancratium zeylanicum | L. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium foetidum | Pomel | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium parvum | Dalzell | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium arabicum | Sickenb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium biflorum | Roxb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium centrale | (A.Chev.) Traub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium donaldi | Blatt. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium landesii | Traub | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium longiflorum | Roxb. ex Ker Gawl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium maximum | Forssk. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium nairii | Sasikala & Reema Kumari | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium parvicoronatum | Geerinck | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium sanctae-mariae | Blatt. & Hallb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium st-mariae | Blatt. & Hallb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium tortuosum | Herb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pancratium verecundum | Aiton | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.