Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Panax trifolius | L. | 986 | documented |
| Panax quinquefolius | L. | 183 | documented |
| Panax pseudoginseng | Wall. | 7 | documented |
| Panax ginseng | C.A.Mey. | 5 | documented |
| Panax japonicus | (T.Nees) C.A.Mey. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax aesculifolia | Griff. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax arunachalensis | Taram, A.P.Das & Tag | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax assamicus | R.N.Banerjee | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax bipinnatifidus | Seem. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax compactus | Barb.Rodr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax excelsa | B.S.Williams | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax fallax | Miq. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax hermannii | Cordem. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax lepidus | W.Bull | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax margaritifer | Vis. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax mastersianus | Sander ex Mast. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax nitidus | W.Bull | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax notoginseng | (Burkill) F.H.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax siamensis | J.Wen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax sokpayensis | Shiva K.Sharma & Pandit | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax stipuleanatus | H.T.Tsai & K.M.Feng | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax vietnamensis | Ha & Grushv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax wangianus | S.C.Sun | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Panax zingiberensis | C.Y.Wu & Feng | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.