Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pachystachys lutea | Nees | 85 | documented |
| Pachystachys spicata | (Ruiz & Pav.) Wassh. | 18 | documented |
| Pachystachys coccinea | (Aubl.) Nees | 8 | documented |
| Pachystachys dubiosa | (Lindau) A.L.A.Côrtes | 8 | documented |
| Pachystachys azaleiflora | (Rusby) A.L.A.Côrtes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys badiospica | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys cordata | (Nees) A.L.A.Côrtes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys fosteri | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys gracilis | A.L.A.Côrtes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys incarnata | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys killipii | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys linearibracteata | A.L.A.Côrtes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys longibracteata | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys ossolae | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys puberula | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys rosea | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys schunkei | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachystachys velutina | (W.Bull) A.L.A.Côrtes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.