Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pachylobus edulis | G.Don | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus bampsianus | (Pierlot) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus buettneri | (Engl.) Guillaumin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus camerunensis | (Onana) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus ebatom | (Aubrév. & Pellegr.) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus heterotrichus | Pellegr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus igaganga | (Aubrév. & Pellegr.) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus klaineanus | (Pierre) Guillaumin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus ledermannii | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus letestui | Pellegr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus macrophyllus | (Oliv.) Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus normandii | (Aubrév. & Pellegr.) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus osika | Guillaumin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus pubescens | Vermoesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus tessmannii | Engl. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus trapnellii | (Onana) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Pachylobus villiersianas | (Onana) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.