Oxera

Accepted species 24 Documented here 2 Family Lamiaceae

Accepted species 24 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Oxera splendida (F.Muell.) Gâteblé & Barrabé 39 documented
Oxera amicorum (Seem.) Gâteblé & Barrabé 6 documented
Oxera baladica Vieill. 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera balansae Dubard 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera brevicalyx (Moldenke) de Kok 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera coriacea Dubard 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera coronata de Kok 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera crassifolia Virot 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera glandulosa Vieill. 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera gmelinoides S.Moore 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera lehuntei (Horne ex Baker) Gâteblé & Barrabé 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera microcalyx Guillaumin 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera morieri Vieill. 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera neriifolia (Montrouz.) Beauvis. 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera oreophila Guillaumin 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera palmatinervia Dubard 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera pancheri Dubard 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera pulchella Labill. 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera robusta Vieill. 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera rugosa Guillaumin 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera sessilifolia Dubard 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera subverticillata Vieill. 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera sulfurea Dubard 0 below the evidence gate
Oxera vanuatuensis de Kok 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.