Ormocarpum

Accepted species 25 Documented here 3 Family Fabaceae

Accepted species 25 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Ormocarpum trichocarpum (Taub.) Engl. 40 documented
Ormocarpum kirkii S.Moore 7 documented
Ormocarpum cochinchinense (Lour.) Merr. 6 documented
Ormocarpum acuminatum Polhill 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum bernierianum (Baill.) Du Puy & Labat 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum coccinea G.Don 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum drakei R.Vig. 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum fijiense Arbainsyah 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum flavum J.B.Gillett 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum keniense J.B.Gillett 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum klainei Tisser. 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum megalophyllum Harms 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum muricatum Chiov. 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum neocaledonicum Arbainsyah 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum philippinense Arbainsyah 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum pubescens (Hochst.) Cufod. ex J.B.Gillett 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum schliebenii Harms 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum sculptilium Arbainsyah 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum sennoides (Willd.) DC. 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum smitsii Arbainsyah 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum suberosum Teijsm. & Binn. 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum trachycarpum (Taub.) Harms 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum vanuatuense Arbainsyah 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum verrucosum P.Beauv. 0 below the evidence gate
Ormocarpum zambesianum Verdc. 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.