Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oritrophium peruvianum | (Lam.) Cuatrec. | 16 | documented |
| Oritrophium limnophilum | (Sch.Bip.) Cuatrec. | 5 | documented |
| Oritrophium blepharophyllum | (S.F.Blake) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium cocuyense | (Cuatrec.) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium crocifolium | (Kunth) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium durangense | G.L.Nesom | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium figueirasii | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium granatum | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium hirtopilosum | (Hieron.) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium llanganatense | Sklenár & H.Rob. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium marahuacense | Steyerm. & Maguire | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium mucidum | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium nevadense | (Wedd.) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium ollgaardii | Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium orizabense | G.L.Nesom | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium paramense | (Aristeg. & Cuatrec.) Aristeg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium repens | (Kunth) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium tergoalbum | (Cuatrec.) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oritrophium venezuelense | (Steyerm.) Cuatrec. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.