Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oplonia spinosa | (Jacq.) Raf. | 28 | documented |
| Oplonia polyece | (Stearn) Borhidi | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia acicularis | (Sw.) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia acuminata | Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia acunae | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia armata | (Sw.) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia cubensis | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia grandiflora | (Lindau) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia hutchisonii | Wassh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia jamaicensis | (Lindau) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia jujuyensis | Wassh. & C.Ezcurra | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia linifolia | (Benoist) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia microphylla | (Lam.) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia minor | (Benoist) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia moana | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia multigemma | Borhidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia nannophylla | (Urb.) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia puberula | Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia purpurascens | (Griseb.) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia tetrasticha | (C.Wright ex Griseb.) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Oplonia vincoides | (Lam.) Stearn | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.